Coordinates to the trap krios placed torches in x-432 z328
Timeer2's illegal trap -x444 z343
For placing 4 torches.. in a newb trap.Jarvisd wrote:I don't see any problem with timeers trap. I mean it is off the path in an area no one has done anything with. And wtf you want krios banned? Krios is one of the oldest staff members on here...
FillerB wrote:Banning for under 3 block griefs.
Just a quick note... STOP FUCKING DOING IT.
Yes, it is grief. Yes, it is against the rules. But come on people. You're just wasting time here since such a small amount of grief almost always gets successfully appealed. Write down their name (Make a topic in here with a list of suspected griefers if you want) and only ban them when you find another occurrence of grief by them.
SlaveofRH wrote:FillerB wrote:Banning for under 3 block griefs.
Just a quick note... STOP FUCKING DOING IT.
Yes, it is grief. Yes, it is against the rules. But come on people. You're just wasting time here since such a small amount of grief almost always gets successfully appealed. Write down their name (Make a topic in here with a list of suspected griefers if you want) and only ban them when you find another occurrence of grief by them.
After your little rule changes.
PetePorty wrote:Rules are not law; that's why we don't call them laws, but we call them rules. You see, there is a reason we have staff; they are smart people who can decide whether the rule broken should have a punishment, and which one it should have. It's pretty simple, actually; if we didn't want that; we'd have a simple script that bans anyone who breaks a block not created by "Environment" unless the block owner used a command to allow him to.
PetePorty wrote:I would suggest any person that creates a trap for people to die, specially a trap for new players, should be banned; considering it's griefing. Also, I think "saving a ton of people's butt" is a hell of a reason too.
PetePorty wrote:Yes, problem. Player versus player; that doesn't mean you should go around making everyone kill themselves. And again, saving new people from being killed is a pretty good reason to place torches.
Wierd... you seem to have a problem with mine.Jarvisd wrote:I don't see any problem with timeers trap. I mean it is off the path in an area no one has done anything with. And wtf you want krios banned? Krios is one of the oldest staff members on here...
krios101 wrote:I'm gonna say what I have to say and get out of here because this is just getting silly now.
First off on that specific day I was checking the general area around the Orcworm statue for any signs of grief anywhere and I couldn't find anything so I wandered around and found this building that I went into, it was dark so I placed down torches like anyone else would; Long-serving staff member or total newb. I had no way of telling that this was a trap intended for new players and that it was built by Red or that it even was a 16 bit Building so don't go saying it was intentional. I only learned that it was a trap yesterday. I was only merely exploring with no intention to grief or destroy anything.
In my eyes traps for new people are wrong and getting worked up over a few placed down torches which anyone would have done is just stupid. You could have simply taken down the torches very simply it's not like I went and placed bedrock everywhere but you had to go and bring it upon yourself to make a scene out of it and trying to get me banned for something as stupid as 4 torches is just utter BS. Just grow up, come off your high horse and come back to reality.
Albuca wrote: Wierd... you seem to have a problem with mine.
As does Timmer2. <-Placed locked signs on my griefer traps.
But hey, I just removed them and carried on.
PetePorty wrote:As I said; the rules clearly state that a staff member can grief whenever he wants to as long as he has a good reason to. Being able to see is a good reason; saving new players from dying is a good reason too, so Krios did not break the rules. The rules don't say anything about making traps for killing people, so it might be wrong or not; either way, Krios did nothing wrong, and you might have.
(Also, Filly, you should prolly say something about traps in the rules...)
PetePorty wrote:I'm pretty sure at least two people mentioned you couldn't see the hole in the ground at all. How can it be obviously a trap when you can't see nothing.
PINGASFIST wrote:PetePorty wrote:I'm pretty sure at least two people mentioned you couldn't see the hole in the ground at all. How can it be obviously a trap when you can't see nothing.
Not to mention if a trap was that obvious there was no point in it existing in the first place, because an obvious trap won't work on anyone, so there shouldn't have been this much butthurt over it to begin with. Surely lighting it up wouldn't even matter if it was obvious anyway?