Home
Good reason to start using em, huh?
+17
uberblake
Monstaboi
skoglol
SlaveofRH
GaMerG77
Lizardman
GoDjMike
Rulyon
Krellyn
Grintendo
Albuca
sieve
StodgY
Pete
Orcworm
Jarvisd
Max_Russell
21 posters
Has Orcworm gone soft?
Lizardman- Posts : 2846
Join date : 2011-03-05
Age : 32
Location : Happy Place
Orcworm- Owner
- Posts : 5936
Join date : 2010-10-31
Age : 29
Location : England
Lets just say it's good that I'm the owner and you're not, eh Lizard? ;p
Lizardman- Posts : 2846
Join date : 2011-03-05
Age : 32
Location : Happy Place
True dat. :3
I assume a lil too much.
I assume a lil too much.
thebadhatter- Posts : 388
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 30
Location : England
If there was no lwc, every time somebody got robbed I imagine they'd kick up a large bitchfit, demanding that someone check if donator powers were used to get into their house or whatever, and this'd probably get tiresome pretty fast I imagine.
I do however, like the idea of no non-PvP zones apart from major cities. It will increase the value of the major cities and reinforce the fact that large communities are safer than remote outposts (dem bandits). This will draw players together and create a closer community, in addition to creating an exciting new dynamic where bandits roam the anarchical no-man's land, while builders and collectors live and defend themselves in the cities. People would have the choice between stability and wealth, or danger and excitement! Whatever suits people's tastes.
And this IS a survival multiplayer server after all :3
I do however, like the idea of no non-PvP zones apart from major cities. It will increase the value of the major cities and reinforce the fact that large communities are safer than remote outposts (dem bandits). This will draw players together and create a closer community, in addition to creating an exciting new dynamic where bandits roam the anarchical no-man's land, while builders and collectors live and defend themselves in the cities. People would have the choice between stability and wealth, or danger and excitement! Whatever suits people's tastes.
And this IS a survival multiplayer server after all :3
Pete- Posts : 3194
Join date : 2010-12-22
Age : 29
Location : Santiago, Chile
He always has the right answer...
Rulyon- Donator
- Posts : 2001
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 39
Location : Fort Worth, Texas, USA
My home will still be safe. My intended style ensures none can enter without griefing. :-)
Sub-terrainean lined with Obby, top-side with glass to max height. >:-)
Sub-terrainean lined with Obby, top-side with glass to max height. >:-)
Lizardman- Posts : 2846
Join date : 2011-03-05
Age : 32
Location : Happy Place
thebadhatter wrote:If there was no lwc, every time somebody got robbed I imagine they'd kick up a large bitchfit, demanding that someone check if donator powers were used to get into their house or whatever, and this'd probably get tiresome pretty fast I imagine.
I do however, like the idea of no non-PvP zones apart from major cities. It will increase the value of the major cities and reinforce the fact that large communities are safer than remote outposts (dem bandits). This will draw players together and create a closer community, in addition to creating an exciting new dynamic where bandits roam the anarchical no-man's land, while builders and collectors live and defend themselves in the cities. People would have the choice between stability and wealth, or danger and excitement! Whatever suits people's tastes.
And this IS a survival multiplayer server after all :3
GaMerG77- Donator
- Posts : 2016
Join date : 2010-12-27
Age : 24
Location : California
Rulyon wrote:My home will still be safe. My intended style ensures none can enter without griefing. :-)
Sub-terrainean lined with Obby, top-side with glass to max height. >:-)
Can I..Can I see your home?
Rulyon- Donator
- Posts : 2001
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 39
Location : Fort Worth, Texas, USA
It's as of yet incomplete. But why would you want to see it? Set a /PW to go a-huntin'?
GaMerG77- Donator
- Posts : 2016
Join date : 2010-12-27
Age : 24
Location : California
Rulyon wrote:It's as of yet incomplete. But why would you want to see it? Set a /PW to go a-huntin'?
I have my /pw's maxed, and I hardly ever PvP since no one else is up to it.
Pete- Posts : 3194
Join date : 2010-12-22
Age : 29
Location : Santiago, Chile
What if someone griefed to get into Ruly's place and someone else steals from him?
GaMerG77- Donator
- Posts : 2016
Join date : 2010-12-27
Age : 24
Location : California
Pete wrote:What if someone griefed to get into Ruly's place and someone else steals from him?
Using grief to an advantage, Eh?
Pete- Posts : 3194
Join date : 2010-12-22
Age : 29
Location : Santiago, Chile
I'm just pointing out what could happen... What would we do then?
Player A griefs Player B
Player C gets in and steals from Player B
Player A gets banned
Player B still lost stuff
What, would you ban Player C or maybe take back the items? For all he knows, Player B's house could have had a hole in purpose. Would you tell Player B to suck it up? His base was griefed and then his stuff was stolen, why should he suck it up? Would you spawn the items to give them to Player B without taking them from Player C? Sure, go ahead and fuck up the economy...
Problems arise when we try to fix what's not broken...
Player A griefs Player B
Player C gets in and steals from Player B
Player A gets banned
Player B still lost stuff
What, would you ban Player C or maybe take back the items? For all he knows, Player B's house could have had a hole in purpose. Would you tell Player B to suck it up? His base was griefed and then his stuff was stolen, why should he suck it up? Would you spawn the items to give them to Player B without taking them from Player C? Sure, go ahead and fuck up the economy...
Problems arise when we try to fix what's not broken...
GaMerG77- Donator
- Posts : 2016
Join date : 2010-12-27
Age : 24
Location : California
Pete wrote:I'm just pointing out what could happen... What would we do then?
Player A griefs Player B
Player C gets in and steals from Player B
Player A gets banned
Player B still lost stuff
What, would you ban Player C or maybe take back the items? For all he knows, Player B's house could have had a hole in purpose. Would you tell Player B to suck it up? His base was griefed and then his stuff was stolen, why should he suck it up? Would you spawn the items to give them to Player B without taking them from Player C? Sure, go ahead and fuck up the economy...
Problems arise when we try to fix what's not broken...
If it was me in that decision, I would tell C to give it back and next time check if the area has been griefed with /lb but if it was a guest, then..I'm a little dumbfounded.
Orcworm- Owner
- Posts : 5936
Join date : 2010-10-31
Age : 29
Location : England
Pete wrote:I'm just pointing out what could happen... What would we do then?
Player A griefs Player B
Player C gets in and steals from Player B
Player A gets banned
Player B still lost stuff
What, would you ban Player C or maybe take back the items? For all he knows, Player B's house could have had a hole in purpose. Would you tell Player B to suck it up? His base was griefed and then his stuff was stolen, why should he suck it up? Would you spawn the items to give them to Player B without taking them from Player C? Sure, go ahead and fuck up the economy...
Problems arise when we try to fix what's not broken...
C would be tempbanned and the items would be taken back through a good old fashioned banned player raid, just a little less hostile.
Rulyon- Donator
- Posts : 2001
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 39
Location : Fort Worth, Texas, USA
I would assume so. In most cases a grief is obviously such. A hole just sized so person can get through, in an otherwise secure area, with no sign of alternate means of security isn't there "by design".
Pete- Posts : 3194
Join date : 2010-12-22
Age : 29
Location : Santiago, Chile
You could place 2 dirt blocks to lock your house, for instance, and a griefer could delete those 2 and the third player would only think you're stupid enough not to have a door... How can you tempban and take away someone's items for doing a perfectly legal action without knowledge of someone else possibly unknown to him breaking the rules?
|
|
|